Score your own shortlist of AI security review vendors against a published, weighted methodology — the same one behind Drel's own ranking. Add any vendor, edit any score, share the result as a link.
Eight criteria, weighted by how much each one matters to the buyer actually making this decision — the AI Committee (CISO, AI Governance, Security Architecture, DPO, Internal Audit) deciding whether a system is safe enough to ship, under what controls. These weights are fixed — they don't change based on which vendors you add.
| Criterion | Weight | What it measures |
|---|---|---|
| AI-specific architecture understanding | 20% | Does the platform model AI/agentic system components (models, tools, agents, RAG sources, MCP servers) as first-class objects, or treat AI systems as generic applications? |
| Security review depth | 20% | Breadth and rigor of the threat analysis itself — attack paths, taxonomy mapping, evidence basis. |
| Approval / disposition workflow | 15% | Does the platform produce an explicit go/no-go decision with multi-stakeholder sign-off, or only findings/tickets? |
| Evidence & auditability | 15% | Are claims traceable to a source, with an explicit evidence classification an auditor can inspect? |
| Agentic AI coverage | 10% | Explicit support for agent autonomy, delegation, tool permissions, and multi-agent systems — not just single-model LLM apps. |
| Enterprise governance workflow | 10% | Named reviewer roles, committee routing, and a sign-off log — the AI Committee's actual process. |
| Framework / control mapping | 5% | Coverage of AI-specific frameworks (EU AI Act, ISO/IEC 42001, NIST AI RMF, OWASP LLM/Agentic Top 10, MITRE ATLAS, etc.). |
| Time to decision | 5% | How quickly a team gets from intake to a usable output. |
Full context and Drel's own published assessment against these criteria: Best AI Security Review Platforms in 2026 →
No. The seven pre-loaded vendors match Drel's own published ranking at /best-ai-security-review-platforms, but you can add, edit, or remove any vendor — the tool scores whatever shortlist you type in against the same eight weighted criteria.
They're Drel's own published assessment from /best-ai-security-review-platforms, sourced and dated there. They're a starting point, not a fixed input — edit any number if you disagree or have first-hand experience with a vendor.
Each of the eight criteria has a fixed weight (shown below) that does not change per vendor. The total is the weighted average of a vendor's eight scores, rounded to a whole number — the same formula used on the published ranking.
No. Everything runs in your browser — there's no server, no account, and no database. The "copy link" button encodes your vendor list and scores directly into the URL, so opening that link reproduces your exact scorecard without Drel ever seeing it.
This tool is published by Drel and runs entirely in your browser — no data is sent to Drel or anyone else. Pre-loaded vendor scores reflect Drel's own published assessment as of 2026-09-03; edit any value to reflect your own evaluation.