The decision
is human
AI can now write the security review. The reasoning that used to take days is becoming abundant. The step that has not moved is the decision.
Read the essayProduce a defensible security review of your AI system in one sitting. The threats, the supporting evidence, and a clearance decision you can export and sign. Ready for your AI committee when you have one.
Drel helps security and product teams review AI, RAG and agentic systems built with the model providers, cloud platforms and engineering tools they already use.
AppSec and security architecture teams are not staffed to manually threat-model every AI, RAG, or agentic system. Traditional threat modeling tools were not designed for LLM trust boundaries, retrieval authorization, or agentic tool use. Assessments pile up. Systems go live without proper security sign-off.
Describe your AI system. Review the agentic architecture. Get a structured clearance decision backed by evidence grading, required controls, and a sign-off chain. Defensible enough for an AI Committee, regulator, or board.
Built specifically for RAG pipelines, agentic workflows, and LLM-powered features. Purpose-built for AI security review, not generic AppSec workflows or one-off generated reports.
Every output is specific to your AI system: named blockers before production, required controls with owners and deadlines, evidence gaps that must close before go-live, and a sign-off chain that creates an audit trail.
Drel turns AI system reviews into defensible clearance decisions, linking blockers, evidence, ownership, sign-offs, and re-review triggers into one audit-ready record.
Turn review evidence into a clearance decision: proceed, conditional, restricted pilot, hold, or decline.
Separate advisory findings from production blockers, missing gates, and unresolved assumptions.
Track whether each claim is explicit, inferred, assumed, missing, or verified.
Capture rationale, owners, sign-offs, versions, and re-review triggers in one defensible record.
RAG assistants, tool-using agents, customer-facing AI features — each architecture pattern carries distinct trust boundaries, retrieval risks, and control requirements. Drel maps all of them to the blockers, evidence states, and clearance decision they require.
Reviewed through one clearance model: blockers, evidence states, control ownership, sign-offs, and re-review triggers.
Each system type has its own threat model, risk patterns, and control library. Built from the specific trust boundaries of that architecture.
Employee-facing assistants over SharePoint, Confluence, and ServiceNow introduce unique trust boundaries — retrieval authorization, prompt injection via documents, and identity propagation across the retrieval chain.
LLM agents with API access to GitHub, Slack, Jira, and PagerDuty require explicit policy gates, approval boundaries, and action authorization. Without them, a single injected instruction can trigger cascading write actions.
AI features embedded in B2B SaaS products must enforce strict tenant isolation, prevent cross-tenant data leakage, and produce go-live evidence for enterprise security questionnaires.
Whether you're a security architect running a solo review or an AI governance lead producing evidence for a committee, Drel gives you the structured clearance record you need.
Run a structured AI security review solo. No committee required. Get a defensible clearance decision in one sitting.
For security architects →AppSec EngineersIntegrate AI security review into your existing secure development lifecycle. Map AI-specific risks to your control library.
For AppSec engineers →AI Governance & DPOsProduce the structured evidence your AI Committee signs. Clearance decisions, control gaps, and evidence packs for ISO 42001 and EU AI Act.
For governance leads →Topic guides
Every threat, control, and remediation item maps directly — so the output lands in your assessment without translation.
No signup required for the demo. See what a clearance decision looks like for a real enterprise AI agent.