The thinking behind AI security review.
Threat models, governance evidence, and the decisions that hold up under scrutiny. Written for security architects and the committees they report to.
New posts in your inbox,
when they publish.
Threat modeling, governance evidence, and what AI Committees actually need — written for security architects and AI governance leads. No cadence promises.
Building an EU AI Act system inventory
The EU AI Act requires knowing every AI system you deploy and its tier. Here's how to build that inventory when AI hides in SaaS and vendor products.
Data poisoning in RAG knowledge bases
RAG knowledge base poisoning inserts malicious content not to corrupt the index, but to influence model outputs when poisoned documents are retrieved.
Mapping the agentic AI attack surface
Five layers of the agentic AI attack surface — prompt channel, tool surface, memory, orchestration boundary, output channel — mapped with controls.
Prompt injection, explained for security reviewers
What prompt injection actually is, how its variants work, how it differs from SQL injection, and which controls reduce the risk in practice.
The AI security review checklist, by lifecycle gate
A lifecycle-gate checklist for AI security reviews: intake through production, with gate-specific questions and evidence needs.
The AI section your vendor security questionnaire is missing
The AI vendor risk assessment questionnaire your procurement process is missing — model governance, re-assessment triggers, incident notification.
Writing an AI governance committee charter
A committee without a charter is a meeting with a name. Authority, composition, quorum, decision types, and escalation paths defined.
MCP security — the four attack surfaces of a Model Context Protocol server
MCP servers expose tools, resources, and prompts — each an attack surface. Defines the four surfaces and review questions for each.
ISO 42001, explained for security teams
ISO 42001 explained for security teams: what the AI management system standard requires, how it differs from 27001, and what auditors expect.
RAG security — the three boundaries that matter
RAG adds three security boundaries between user and model: data, retrieval, and context. Each has distinct failure modes a standard LLM review misses.
EU AI Act risk tiers, explained for engineers
Four risk tiers determine your EU AI Act obligations. How to classify your system and what each tier demands.
Agentic AI security — the surfaces deterministic software does not have
Agentic AI security covers four surfaces deterministic software lacks: hijackable reasoning, tool manifests, persistent memory, drifting goals.
Free resources
Practical templates for every framework covered here.
AI Security Review Template
Full evidence pack with threat model, controls, and evidence grading.
OWASP Agentic Top 10 Controls
Each risk mapped to required controls and lifecycle gates.
Decision Memo
Clearance decision template with rationale and sign-off log.
AI Go-Live Security Checklist
Production gate checklist for security architects and CISOs.