Blog

The thinking behind AI security review.

Threat models, governance evidence, and the decisions that hold up under scrutiny. Written for security architects and the committees they report to.

Newsletter

New posts in your inbox,
when they publish.

Threat modeling, governance evidence, and what AI Committees actually need — written for security architects and AI governance leads. No cadence promises.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Regulation11 min

EU AI Act obligations for deployers (not just providers)

Deployers -- not just providers -- carry significant EU AI Act obligations. What organizations using AI systems for their own purposes must do.

Technical11 min

Vector Database Security — RAG Pipeline Checklist

Vector databases inherit standard data-store security requirements plus RAG-specific ones. The full security checklist for production pipelines.

Governance11 min

Human-in-the-loop boundaries that actually hold

HITL is the most common agentic control and the most often specified in ways that don't hold. What a robust boundary requires — and the failure modes.

Technical10 min

Model denial of service and cost-exhaustion attacks

LLM DoS doesn't require crashing the service — just making it expensive. Cost-exhaustion attacks are under-defended in most assessed AI systems.

Governance9 min

Who runs the AI security review — roles and hand-offs

AI security reviews span architects, security engineers, governance leads, and DPOs. Map the hand-offs to avoid dropped gates.

Governance11 min

The anatomy of an AI evidence pack

The complete artifact set a governance committee needs for a defensible AI decision. What goes in, and why order and labeling matter.

Foundations10 min

Why SOC 2 is not AI assurance

SOC 2 covers infrastructure and process. It says nothing about model behavior, training data, or edge cases. AI assurance needs different evidence.

Governance12 min

Building an AI management system (AIMS) from scratch

An AI management system is governance infrastructure: policies, procedures, roles, records for defensible AI decisions at scale. How to build one.

Reference10 min

Vetting third-party MCP servers before you connect them

Every third-party MCP server extends your agent's attack surface. The vetting process: source review, manifest audit, permission scope, and evidence.

Regulation10 min

RAG PII Leakage — 3 Retrieval Paths That Expose Data

RAG over internal corpora frequently exposes personal data never intended to be queryable. The most common data-protection finding in RAG security reviews.

Regulation11 min

EU AI Act vs GDPR — where they overlap for AI systems

GDPR and the EU AI Act overlap heavily for AI processing personal data. Where obligations are additive, and which review artifacts satisfy both.

Technical13 min

Security review for multi-agent systems

When agents orchestrate agents, single-agent trust assumptions multiply. Covers inter-agent trust, capability delegation, and blast-radius containment.